The worst deal in America: “Free Lunch” senior seminars

You say you’re too smart to get trapped by a free-lunch “senior seminar?” Guess again. Older people with good incomes and business or professional backgrounds are the tactic’s red meat.

You’re invited by a prominent financial firm (or what sounds like one) for an “educational” session on, say, estate planning or improving your retirement income. With free wine and roast beef on offer, you figure, “What can go wrong?” Then there’s a humming in your ears. When you wake up, you find that you’ve invested in something you regret.

Affluent seniors get sucked in because they have time on their hands, money questions in their heads, and no independent planner or adviser to consult. Half of the presentations are shot through with misleading claims, according to a 2007 study by federal and state securities regulators. A quarter of them pitch unsuitable products — too risky, too costly, illiquid — to the people who attend.

It’s gotten so bad that the AARP and the North American Securities Administrators Association teamed up last month to create a new “free lunch monitor” program to help seniors save themselves and others from the oil poured into their ears.

Anyone can be a monitor. If you get a free-lunch invitation and want to act as a cop on the beat, download the AARP’s four-page guide to listening and take it with you. As the salesperson talks, make notes in the guide. Did he tell you the drawbacks of the investment? Disclose the cost? Ask you for personal financial information?  Press you to sign up? Bad answers amount to a woo-ah, woo-ah alarm, to warn that financial whirlpools lie ahead.

If you sense a cheat, send your notes to the AARP for review. Potential violations will be passed to a state securities administrator. Among the products apt to be pitched abusively: various types of annuities, oil and gas investments, reverse mortgages, and high-interest promissory notes.

The 2007 study found that 78 percent of seniors had gotten at least one free-lunch invitation over the previous three years, and 60 percent received six or more. The venues are flattering: fancy restaurants, country clubs, and upscale hotels. Who would lie to you, in a room with oak on the walls and a Turkey carpet on the floor?

The sponsoring firm – a brokerage house, investment adviser, or insurance agency – might promise that you’ll hear only talk. “Nothing will be sold,” the invitation says. With that assurance, you might think that you can attend just to pick up some tax or investing tips.

But these carefully scripted lunches are designed to excite, confuse or scare you, not leave you better informed. Once the hook is in, the firm will offer enlightenment, in the form of a follow-up call and visit. The salespeople earn rich (and hidden) commissions from the products on offer. If asked, the presenter might say that you don’t pay the commission, “the company” does (with your money, of course). You usually can’t find out all the costs and fees.

The regulators advise you to go to these lunches forearmed with questions and doubts. My advice is to go as an avenging monitor or not at all.

Tags: , , , , ,

4 comments
Kathy // 07/08/2010 at 5:37 pm

I’ve occasionally gone to these when the restaurant is especially good (Ruth’s Chris, mostly). I go for the meal and because it amuses me to find out what is being pushed. Usually it’s some kind of annuity, although I did once get some good advice about taxation and inheritance of IRAs. Next time I go I’ll remember to check in with AARP.

Reply
Jane // 07/20/2010 at 1:07 am

The AARP would love to have you monitor

Reply
jim // 07/09/2010 at 7:26 am

I have been to about 20 of these free dinners or lunches. Thus far, I have not purchased anything, I have attended consultations only about 3 times of the 20 meal events. They often sell a version of annuity in which you get some of the gain when stock mk goes up, none of loss when it goes down, and they assure perhaps 5 or 6% annual income, and at times a bonus of 5% or 10% value of your investment for signing up. Considering the now CD payments of 1%, brought on by the federal goverments efforts to help some of the very greedy and dishonest business sectors that brought all these problems to us in the first place, and punish seniors or responsible people. Well, I am not sure their annuities have hidden costs and frustrations, but they kind of sound good the way they are presented, yet I have an impression the only annuity is a dead annuity, well actuall, an immediate pay fixed annuity., is the only good one, if you have a need to convert a savings in equity into a long term., or life stream of income, then it will do that for you. jdh. 7-9-2010

Reply
Jane // 07/20/2010 at 1:06 am

I too like immediate annuities. The variable annuities sold through free-lunch seminars can be useful in certain circumstances, although they are not my cup of tea. I have written about them here — http://janebryantquinn.com/2010/06/set-up-a-future-retirement-income-with-new-style-annuities/

Reply
Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Have Jane Speak

"In the five years I have been with the organization, I have never before seen the audience give any speaker a standing ovation." — Ceramic Tile
Distributors Association
learn more

Jane’s Book Club

Jane’s Bio

Jane Bryant Quinn is a nationally known commentator on personal finance, with books and columns read and trusted by millions.
learn more